[Not loaded yet]
[Not loaded yet]
But that just enables developmental disruption.
For a child, healthy psychological development throughout their life is important and suggesting to them that they can experient with gender identity does not properly foster a healthy environment for them to integrate their minds with their bodies.
[Not loaded yet]
Its not about “being trans is bad”
It’s about phenomena of gender incongruence/dysphoria stem from psychological and developmental disruptions. Most kids desist and when unqualified teachers take it upon themselves to “play with” children’s identities, they worsen the condition and prolong treatment
[Not loaded yet]
…no. That’s the whole point 😕.
It’s not pretty clear the child “found a location they felt free to express themselve”
She was socially conditioned by school staff. She reverted back to a female identity after the school went to remote learning
What made you think this was a “genuine transition”?
[Not loaded yet]
Again…this stuff is widely reported and had been going on for awhile.
When you say “Teachers allow a child to secretly express their gender” what you’re functionally saying is “teachers are concealing a child’s mental health condition (gender dysphoria) from parents and prolonging the condition”
There are literal court cases and documented instances of this happening.
Why are you lying?
[Not loaded yet]
[Not loaded yet]
…”effort”
You actually think making ai art takes effort…..noted.
Like 20 seconds
Still. Not that deep
[Not loaded yet]
Lol. Again. It’s not that deep.
[Not loaded yet]
…bruh. It’s not that deep
There we go. Support this man.
Letter from Dem Senator Chris Van Hollen (MD) requesting a meeting with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele
To discuss MD father Kilmar Abrego Garcia's return
"If Kilmar is not home by midweek – I plan to travel to El Salvador this week to check on his condition and discuss his release."
[Not loaded yet]
His asylum claim was denied…that’s part of the process. If your asylum claim is denied and you have been determined to have entered the country illegally, you are eligible for deportation.
This has been known for awhile.
[Not loaded yet]
Cringe
[Not loaded yet]
[Not loaded yet]
Good God that was random.
Very culty.
“Hey let’s discuss AI capabilities”
“I can’t. you’re a person that disagrees with me on unrelated things so not only am I not going to discuss anything with you about AI but I want you to eat feces and die because I’m a tolerant person”.
Culty
[Not loaded yet]
Info here
[Not loaded yet]
…what’s the “checkmate”?
It’s not that deep.
Not every interaction is a challenge
[Not loaded yet]
…the point is it aggregates it all together and correctly distinguishes you across platforms.
It’s Intersting what it can find with just a first and last name. Take into mind this is just your social media handle
[Not loaded yet]
….they have actual links. We didn’t “write” it. It searched these up.
Ai has been able to search for years now. Only now has it been refined to actually be useful.
For example here is one of the links/references it provides.
[Not loaded yet]
Perhaps, but you need to read the second comment below with there it’s getting its references/justification for those arguments to be novel.
I don’t know if they truly are, that’s why it would be up to you to provide cases where these arguments have been made before.
[Not loaded yet]
I get that.
I was being hyperbolic.
However it’s impressive it was able to get all that just with one social media handle
…it just made something generic.
You see if you simply ask it in context to make novel legal arguments…it will and will provide sources to show.
However it’s not perfect. You can check this for accuracy/quality
Here it gives 3 “novel” legal arguments.
In the second comment there will be refs
Here is some referenced cases it’s using to clarify the nuanced instances to which specific legal concerns were not truly tested in court yet pertaining to drone surveillance.
[Not loaded yet]
[Not loaded yet]
What do you think?
It already knows who you are and everything about you.
Even mentioned some of your pieces on Patreon
[Not loaded yet]
You offended it.
Seeing a lot of pro-/anti-AI arguments so, to settle this, I've taken all your posts without consent or payment and crammed them into an inefficient statistical model that spits out post variations which should be treated as gospel unless they're wrong in which case I warned you it makes mistakes.🙏
Let’s test this.
Give me prompt that you would be interested/surprised the ai would get right or give a high quality answer to.
Things have changed recently. Would like to see what you would consider efficient by an LLM.
Also how did it do on your report?
[Not loaded yet]
You offended it.
It argued more but this is all I could fit in screenshots
Perhaps you want to test it with something more specific? I have the new o3/o4 mini access. I’ll type it up. It’s the best in the market most agree.
BREAKING: Protests break out outside of the courtroom after Judge Dugan is arrested for protecting an immigrant.
[Not loaded yet]
But administrative warrants can be used by ICE and have been for a long time. Local authorities are irrelevant here
It specifically states that admin warrants are used by ICE for arrests
[Not loaded yet]
No just tried to fact check what you’re claiming.
The warrant was valid. It was an admin warrant that allows ice to arrest illegals in courthouses.
The judge knowingly directed the illegal in areas of the courthouse where ICE would have legal difficulty making the arrest.
The illegal ran away
[Not loaded yet]
What’s your middle initial?
[Not loaded yet]
Well it may not be able to get everything.
This that SCOTUS though? And a few other cases citing you
It found it pretty easy.
There’s more I’ll comment
[Not loaded yet]
Dude…can’t believe you said that…
When people are in positions of authority and know the legal system…that often incentivizes them to break the law because they feel they are smart enough to get away with it.
This political corruption 101
[Not loaded yet]
Yes an ai can now today can see basically anything g you can see online that isn’t hidden behind a paywall or a login. If it’s reported and searchable. It can see it.
It can even see you…
Advancements have been made.
How well did it do?
Breaking News: FBI Director Kash Patel said that agents arrested a Wisconsin county judge and accused her of obstructing immigration enforcement, a major escalation in the Trump administration’s battle with local authorities over deportations.
Wisconsin Judge Arrested, Accused of Shielding Immigrant From Federal Agents
Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested on suspicion that she “intentionally misdirected federal agents away from” an immigrant being pursued by the authorities, the F.B.I. director said in a social media pos...
[Not loaded yet]
I’m a us citizen that didn’t break immigration law rendering me eligible for deportation…nor did I punch a woman…
[Not loaded yet]
Ok so when a suspect of a crime says “I didn’t do it” or says “The police/FBI are lying” that’s what you consider really good evidence you can use to argue that the suspect in question is actually innocent?
Dude…
[Not loaded yet]
If believing I’m a bot makes you feel better…
…I understand.
[Not loaded yet]
I just cited the article on the case….If you’re a real lawyer then you should be able clearly and in concise fashion have a better way to explain your view in this.
I’m sorry but you know the 2019 case only didn’t see a conviction because Shelby took the deal….you know that…
[Not loaded yet]
Sure…I agree…
Can you point to any info I got wrong in my arguments?
[Not loaded yet]
Yes I understand that. I’ve been using ai for years now. I assume those official databases are account locked/paywalled etc.
Regardless cases are widely reported and archived for free online to which an ai with tool use can see
What about the Wikipedia article on the 2019 case is factually wrong?
[Not loaded yet]
I’m sorry but the warrant in this current is not a red herring
Reports have shown that the judge claims ICE had no warrant
However that’s a lie and she was notified they had an admin warrant
She moved the illegal into a jury room which could be obstruction
Officers eventually chased him down
[Not loaded yet]
No the courthouse itself is public but specific rooms in a courthouse are not public.
But regardless of wether one room is public or not, if you are a judge and you are ushering an illegal immigrant away from ICE knowingly with a warrant for their arrest then you are obstructing arrest
[Not loaded yet]
You’re trying to suggest that because this specific case didn’t render a conviction, that what this latest judge did could be considered legal or not chargeable action 😕
The Joseph case showed very similar circumstances and if she didn’t agree to a resolution she would’ve surely been convicted.
[Not loaded yet]
“She” Shelly M. Richmond Joseph was given a resolution…”As part of the resolution, Joseph agreed to submit to disciplinary proceedings before the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct.”
Yes she didn’t face conviction but she was not exonerated
It means that charges like these are credible.
[Not loaded yet]
That was early on before ai could even cite things directly from online.
This is really basic dude
I asked it basically operate like a search engine…it cites a Wikipedia article…..the Wikipedia article exists with several references/citations
Now just answer this: Does this 2019 case not exist?
[Not loaded yet]
….this is actually kind of scary. I agree ai isn’t always the best…but this is extremely basic. How did you not know this? 13 years
You as a lawyer I would expect should know the difference between an administrative warrant and a judicial one
As you know ICE doesn’t need a judicial warrant here
[Not loaded yet]
You’re a lawyer? Holy crap that’s terrifying
There was whole case from 2019 where a very similar situation like this happened.
The judge was able to make a deal but they were not exonerated for doing nearly the same thing in this current case.
[Not loaded yet]
Several media outlets are reporting on this…..there was even a 2019 case similar to this where a judge was charged. They have that judge a deal but she was not exonerated.
[Not loaded yet]
…dude it literally just cited that exact 2019 case and provided the source below to which I showed you the screens shots
how did you not know that?
Also no, in this current case the report says she moved them to a jury room….an administrative warrant won’t let ICE in jury rooms, hence not public
[Not loaded yet]
Eventually you will have to accept that you’re wrong in this one
[Not loaded yet]
….dude this has nothing to do with Twitter. I barely use it.
You didn’t even know ICE had a warrant. You haven’t researched any of this situation.
[Not loaded yet]
ICE had a warrant and the media already reported she moved them into a jury room.
This is similar to a 2019 case with a judge doing almost the same thing.
Read the news
[Not loaded yet]
The ai researches sources online in real time.
Also whether you respond to me or not that has nothing to do with luck just your ego I guess. I don’t care either way.
Also there was a pretty similar case that occurred in 2019.
Prosecution cut them a deal. This judge wasn’t exonerated
[Not loaded yet]
And yes she doesn’t have the legal obligation to assist them but she cannot obstruct them and knowingly assist an illegal immigrant evade arrest
