dude she was charged with obstruction and concealing an illegal immigrant She is accused of leading ICE away from the illegal immigrant at the courthouse This illegal has been charged originally with 3 counts of battery one on a woman I’m sorry but you can’t defend this judge or illegal immigrant

You do know that charges do not prove guilt, right? Please tell me you do…

Yes I know that…I’m just going off what we know so far based in what’s reported. So far it shows ICE had a warrant and the judge obstructed

Obstructed how? Cite case law supporting your contention. And you’re lucky I’m even responding to this given your AI “citation.”

The ai researches sources online in real time. Also whether you respond to me or not that has nothing to do with luck just your ego I guess. I don’t care either way. Also there was a pretty similar case that occurred in 2019. Prosecution cut them a deal. This judge wasn’t exonerated

1. The AI searches case reporters? Really?? I promise it does not… 2. In that case, the judge escorted them to a private exit that was not publicly-accessible. In this case, THERE WAS A DEA ARRESTING AGENT ON THE PUBLIC ELEVATOR WITH THE PERSON, WHO THEN EXITED THE BUILDING FROM A PUBLIC EXIT.

…dude it literally just cited that exact 2019 case and provided the source below to which I showed you the screens shots how did you not know that? Also no, in this current case the report says she moved them to a jury room….an administrative warrant won’t let ICE in jury rooms, hence not public

I don’t think you understand how AI works… Pulling case information from media reports—those times when AI doesn’t just hallucinate a citation—isn’t even remotely the same as searching an official reporter. There’s a reason why dozens of attorneys have been sanctioned for using AI like this.

That was early on before ai could even cite things directly from online. This is really basic dude I asked it basically operate like a search engine…it cites a Wikipedia article…..the Wikipedia article exists with several references/citations Now just answer this: Does this 2019 case not exist?

Excepting propriety AI LLM’s that are anything but free, AI cannot cite cases directly from official reporters—it can only regurgitate what someone else has cited on a publicly-accessible webpage, which may or may not even be accurate. How are you not understanding this?

Yes I understand that. I’ve been using ai for years now. I assume those official databases are account locked/paywalled etc. Regardless cases are widely reported and archived for free online to which an ai with tool use can see What about the Wikipedia article on the 2019 case is factually wrong?

Does an AI know if a case was later overruled, called into question, or narrowed by a higher court? And, btw: district court decisions are never controlling case law, not even in the same court, let alone one from a different circuit.

Yes an ai can now today can see basically anything g you can see online that isn’t hidden behind a paywall or a login. If it’s reported and searchable. It can see it. It can even see you… Advancements have been made. How well did it do?

It missed the dozen law reviews I’ve been cited in and about the same number of federal cases. It missed that I was cited in a SCOTUS brief by a state AG. It missed the many successful state court appeals I’ve litigated. It missed other stuff, but I don’t want to sound arrogant.