I've found AI to not be great at the type of analysis lawyers engage in. It can tell me about a case and a holding and even compare cases, but it struggles with the innovation of creating a good argument in my experience. Which I think is fine. That's what the lawyer is for.

You offended it. It argued more but this is all I could fit in screenshots Perhaps you want to test it with something more specific? I have the new o3/o4 mini access. I’ll type it up. It’s the best in the market most agree.

Lol, yeah that's a pretty good demonstration of what I'm talking about. It's just summarizing information from cases and not doing anything novel.

…it just made something generic. You see if you simply ask it in context to make novel legal arguments…it will and will provide sources to show. However it’s not perfect. You can check this for accuracy/quality Here it gives 3 “novel” legal arguments. In the second comment there will be refs

None of that is novel.

Perhaps, but you need to read the second comment below with there it’s getting its references/justification for those arguments to be novel. I don’t know if they truly are, that’s why it would be up to you to provide cases where these arguments have been made before.

No, I see you're a transphobe. Eat shit and die.