Glossip v. Gross (2015), McDonnell v. US (2016), Trump v. Hawaii (2017), Rucho v. Common Cause (2019), Seila Law v. CFPB (2020), NYSRPA v. Bruen (2022), Trump v. Anderson (2024), Loper-Bright v. Raimondo (2024)
In my opinion? Absolutely.
Taney brought us the disastrous Dred Scott, but Roberts has delivered horrible rulings on a wide variety of issues — Citizens United, Heller, Shelby County, Brnovich, Dobbs, and of course Trump v US.
Clapper v Amnesty (2013) if we're allowed to go back earlier too, for "this program is avowedly public and concerns some large unspecified number of individuals, but because no *particular* individual is specified, nobody has standing to review its constitutionality"
