The NYT and SCOTUS both believe it isn’t “corruption” unless an official is caught accepting a giant bag of cash with literal dollar signs on it *and* saying in front of witnesses “in exchange for this illegal offer of money I will do ____”
May 12, 2025 15:16The complicity of the NYT and SCOTUS helped bring us here, so unsurprising that they continue to normalize authoritarianism.
Excessive legal nitpicking required to allow Trump to skate free.
He buried his ex wife at his golf course for the tax exemption available to a cemetery. Not a joke.
I hate this timeline you guys 😩
Of course they know what the GOP is doing it's corrupt, sometimes treasonous, but as long as a Republican is doing it, they'll provide the flack.
Like this???
Fuck the New York Times and everyone that works for them
So basically, if you don’t cartoonishly bribe someone or get caught slinging giant bags with $$$ like it’s a scene from Looney Tunes, it’s not “technically” corruption?
Standards for accountability are quite literally zero.
We don’t have a supreme court anymore. We have domestic terrorists labeling themselves as the court of the land, but they they rule based on politics not law. zero respect for them they are nothing but another arm of maga. And when he goes after them, we will do nothing like they did for us.
But are these entities considering who they say it's not "corruption "...
He has 34 Felonies!
He all about being corrupt.
Important to remember:
Even the “good” judges at SCOTUS lean in this direction. 🫤
*only if Republican
