P Simon
Single male, 60, live in Ontario Canada.
- Liberal
- collector of movie figure statues
- 45 years a Christian now turned Atheist (there will be blasphemy)
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- So you are deliberately misusing the word (assigning it new meaning) to suit your need. Sort of like me saying I am a vegan who enjoys eating meat. Thanks for the clarification.👍
- If it does not require a spirit why bother calling it spiritual... Why not just say 'I am an atheist'? spir·it·u·al adjective 1. relating to or affecting the human spirit or soul as opposed to material or physical things. 2. relating to religion or religious belief.
- AOC: “We are on the eve of an authoritarian administration.” 🇺🇸
- [Not loaded yet]
- He thinks that because the 2020 election was rigged (YES I KNOW IT WASN'T) that is why he won the 2024 election. This is what he keeps going on about. You believe otherwise. Fine. Believe what you want. I am done with this thread since we are just repeating ourselves.
- [Not loaded yet]
- I KNOW the 2020 election was not rigged. I was saying Trump said it was. And I am fine with you disagreeing. It's not like anything will change regardless.
- [Not loaded yet]
- What are you going on about? I never said or even implied you were a republican. I am on your side despite our opinion on what Trump was talking about.
- [Not loaded yet]
- IF you want actual evidence Republicans rigged the election, here it is, over 3 million left leaning voters purged at the last minute. Sadly that does not seem to be illegal in those states and each voter would have to confirm and contest their vote. www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhzJ...
- [Not loaded yet]
- What does that matter. He is saying they rigged he election in 2020 and we won in 2024. It's 'Trump speak'. Trying to assert he said the 2024 election was rigged in his favor would not hold up in court.
- [Not loaded yet]
- EXACTLY!
- [Not loaded yet]
- Sadly even this can not be held against him since he is saying it was the rigging of the 2020 election that convinced more people to vote for him in 2024.
- [Not loaded yet]
- He's talking about the 2020 election. If that election was not rigged he would have finished his second term in 2024 and be gone now.
- [Not loaded yet]
- 🦗 🦗 🦗
- [Not loaded yet]
- Theists, "Free Will something something something..."🙄
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- According to Revelations, the Book of Life is already written so apparently God already knows who is going to Heaven and Hell so therefore it does not matter what anyone does. God's "Divine Plan" will be fulfilled. Imagine a monster that creates people KNOWING they will burn in Hell for eternity.😕
- [Not loaded yet]
- This POS resides over the largest pedophile ring in human history but we Atheists are the problem. 🙄
- [Not loaded yet]
- He doesn't have very nice things to say about us. 😕
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- "They do care about visibility and they care A LOT." I am guessing you completely missed Trump's first 2 Impeachments and are not paying attention to what they are saying/doing over Trump's blatant refusal to uphold the US Constitution or abide by the rulings of judges. I'm done here.
- [Not loaded yet]
- "You keep saying this" bc it's true. Either way the Dems will do what they do so I guess this discussion is over.
- [Not loaded yet]
- "...forcing Republicans to vote on them for visibility" Republicans don't care about visibility. They are full in on betraying America and are not shy about it anymore. So if this is about shaming them, it's a waste of time.
- [Not loaded yet]
- I guess you missed the part where once he is acquitted, the case may not be brought up again. Take care.
- [Not loaded yet]
- POS-OTUS Trump can be Impeached more than once but the trial in the Senate for the same crime can not be. Once he is acquitted, the case may not be brought up again...
- [Not loaded yet]
- Republicans won't care just like they didn't care the first 2 times POS-OTUS Trump was impeached. Of course there is a downside side. Once POS-OTUS Trump is impeached for an item, he cannot be Impeached a second time for the same item. It makes NO SENSE to waste an impeachment KNOWING you will lose.
- [Not loaded yet]
- 2 options 1. Impeach now KNOWING nothing will come of it and waste the opportunity if the Dems take the Senate 2. HOPE America votes to give Congress back to the Dems and Impeach POS-OTUS Trump and actually remove him from office 1. automatically fails while 2. is still a chance. No brainer.
- [Not loaded yet]
- You can't enforce the rule of law when the current law makers are the Republicans in Congress who keep giving POS-OTUS Trump a free 'get out of jail' card. LET the crimes build up so you have a solid easily proven case next year while still speaking out against them.
- [Not loaded yet]
- Check the news. Dems are talking about it. But taking ANY action now will result in Trump getting away with it so long as he has a Republican majority in Congress protesting him.
- [Not loaded yet]
- Impeaching Trump now, knowing nothing will come of it, is no different that writing a sternly worded letter. America will know what side you are on but nothing will change. The longer Trump commits crimes, the easier it will be to Impeach and remove him from office after the midterm.
- What is the point of impeaching Trump now when it will only fail in the Republican owned Senate. The best time would be after the midterm IF America votes to give Congress back to the Dems. THEN not only can they Impeach POS-OTUS Trump, they can actually remove him from office.
- [Not loaded yet]
- In short, there is no evidence for Biblical God because the BIBLE SAYS SO. It specifically says you need "FAITH" and it describes Faith as hope being the evidence. HOPE IS NOT EVIDENCE. They believe in God because they want to. That's it!
- Once again, POS-OTUS Trump fucks over America while making Canada Great Again!... www.facebook.com/reel/1196873...
- [Not loaded yet]
-
View full threadI believe st nick is a real person, but no he doesn't fly on Christmas Eve as Santa. See how I can say one thing without admitting the other. Can you?
- Then there is no reason to believe that even if Jesus was a real man, he was also the son of a God. One would first have to prove the existence of a God THEN show proof he had a son that walked on Earth. Any historical Jesus is NOT proof he was the son of a God like St. Nick isn't Santa.
- It does. If Jesus was a historical man, then there is the possibility he is God and said what I posted earlier about loving God with your mind. But if he wasn't historical, then it's impossible that he was God and said what I claimed he said
- So do you believe that since Saint Nicolas was a real person, there is a chance he lives in the North Pole and rides a sleigh pulled by flying reindeer? The Bible makes claims a son of a God said things. This does not make it true even if another man with the same name walked the Earth.
- 2 And see how I can say that without saying 1 But even when the evidence shows 2 for Jesus without baking you accept 1, you continue to say IF WHY?
- I answered this in a previous post. At the beginning of this thread you asked a question of God having us use our mind. I replied with a response that referred to Biblical Faith. YOU invoked Jesus. Since then YOU went off of this historical Jesus rant which has NOTHING to do with this thread.
- [Not loaded yet]
- IF historical Jesus existed, WHAT IS YOUR POINT? Just come out and say it instead of making me agree with something that has nothing to do with the topic of Fictional Jesus not being real.
- [Not loaded yet]
- POS-OTUS should be impeached for Treason and I agree with him on the punishment he wants for Traitors...
- You have made two comments on historical Jesus 1) he's a fictional character 2) you don't know if he actually existed These are both incorrect views. You could educate yourself and learn the correct view, without even changing your stance on God. Why won't you engage with this?
- Let me ask you, Is St Nicholas... 1. the same person who has flying reindeer and lives in the North Pole 2. was the inspiration for the fictional character, Santa, who has flying reindeer and lives in the North Pole
- Regardless what you THINK I said or was referring to, I clarified myself so go with that. AGAIN... - Biblical, Son of God, Jesus is Fiction (absolutely no proof he existed) - Historical Jesus (IF he even existed) is NOT Biblical Jesus (the Son of God). He would have just been a normal man.
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- I hear you. I grew up Catholic till I was around 12 then we converted to Pentecostal. That remained with me till I was 47 and renounced all religion.
- I would be the opposite. I would NOT indoctrinate my child by brainwashing them in a church till they were 13 but instead would let them decide if they wanted to join a religion AFTER they leave home.😏
- [Not loaded yet]
- AMEN!😆
- Both of my parents are the very definition of centrist voters. Both of them are sick and tired of milquetoast, do-nothing Democrat candidates but vote for them because they have to because the alternative is a nightmare. They want to vote for someone who will do something for the working class.
- Everyone ignores the work Biden and the Dems did and forget that they kneecapped the Dems in 2024 so they are no longer able to do anything.🙄
- Josephus (unedited certain) Tacitus Celcus Lucian of samosata Ireneus Pliny the younger Thallus Sextus Julius Africanus Mara bar serapian Those are just some. Spelling is probably not correct
- You keep going on about some historical Jesus while my comments have been towards Biblical, son of God Jesus. Like someone arguing the existence of Saint Nicholas when the topic is on the Magic, North Pole Santa. You can't prove 'son of God' by trying to prove the existence of an ordinary man.
- So you dont know if the historical Jesus existed, but Jesus/God u you feel confident in saying definitely no? Did I sum that up fairly? In just going to list some sources that show the historical Jesus, not necessarily God, but Jesus the person, existed, and we can go through them if you want. Ok?
- I really don't care about a possible historic Jesus. Weather he actually existed is irreverent to weather a son of a God walked the Earth. First, prove God exists then prove he had a son who walked the Earth. These have NEVER been proven which is why I don't believe. Simple as that.
- You say no idea now, but the messages ago you said no. What changed your mind in such a short time. You said before he was fiction but now you are saying you don't know. Which is it How many ancient sources for Jesus can you name that exist outside the Bible?
- "How many ancient sources for Jesus can you name that exist outside the Bible?" I don't know of any but are told some exist.
- I have been consistent. When I am talking about magic, son of God Jesus, he is not real. NO evidence for his existence. When you asked about a possible real man named Jesus. I said I don't know since there is no real consensus. These are NOT the same thing so I am not changing my mind.
- [Not loaded yet]
- The question is also irrelevant since my arguments are against a supernatural son of God named Jesus. There is no evidence a God exists or that it's son walked the Earth. St Nick = real. Santa = Not real. Mohamed = real. Magic Mohamed = Not real. Jesus = maybe real. Jesus, son of God = Bullshit.
