Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ

• 
  Ivan Flis iflis.bsky.social · 20h
  What do folks think about this statement about AI? Would you agree (I’m especially interested in the opinions of the cognitive scientists, historians and philosophers of science among you)? Why?
  • synapse-fingers synapse-fingers.bsky.social · May 14
    [Not loaded yet]
  1

  Repost Quote post

  3

  View on BlueskyCopy Bluesky URLCopy post URLTranslate postShow all post labels
• View full thread
  
  Ivan Flis iflis.bsky.social · 18h
  I also find it disturbing that if you question the hype, you’re somehow instantly anti-science. Reminds me of a certain psychologist telling me that I should study paychology if I want to criticize its methods.
  2

  Repost Quote post

  1

  View on BlueskyCopy Bluesky URLCopy post URLTranslate postShow all post labels
• 
  Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ olivia.science · 18h
  It's because they give away what they think science is. Have you read Isabelle Stengers? She's great.
  1

  Repost Quote post

  1

  View on BlueskyCopy Bluesky URLCopy post URLTranslate postShow all post labels
• 
  Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ olivia.science · May 13
  I've felt for a while that a mainstream method, reverse engineering, in cognitive science & AI is incompatible w computationalism‼️ So I wrote "Modern Alchemy: Neurocognitive Reverse Engineering" w the wonderful Natalia S. & @irisvanrooij.bsky.social to elaborate: philsci-archive.pitt.edu/25289/ 1/n
  
  Repost Quote post

  2

  2

  View on BlueskyCopy Bluesky URLCopy post URLTranslate postDownload image (1)Download image (2)Download image (3)Show all post labels