For some reason recently I’ve seen a lot of “actually decimate doesn’t mean to destroy something, only to reduce it by one tenth🤓” and I would counter by saying that actually a word means what it’s commonly understood to mean
A word’s etymology is not its definition, and no non-pedant has used ‘decimate’ in that context in probably a century or more
Even then, they act as though 1 out of 10 is mundane. It was visceral enough to have made it into English usage in its current state. It enjoyed some time as mostly a Church term for taxes, but by the 17th century took on its form today. Why? Because the origin of the word is brutal.
It’d be the equivalent of a US battalion failing so bad that they’re decimated, losing 10%. That’s anywhere from 30-100 soldiers just executed arbitrarily.
So yeah, the etymology nerds should maybe sit down and think it through.
And it’s not just arbitrarily executed. “Hey, you guys know Johnson, the dude who has saved our asses and is kind of a bad ass? Yeah, he drew the short straw so we have to beat him to death.”
Meanwhile, etymology nerds going on “well it’s only 1 out of 10 of us.”
May 14, 2025 04:47