Mkay I’ll stress about the art theft and other ethical issues instead.

I think I'll trust MIT's thoughts on this. Because it's not just abt how it is now; it's abt the continued projected use, right? news.mit.edu/2025/explain...

Everyone's like, it only increases per capita emissions by 20-30% as though that's not the single biggest increase

Did a LLM write this?

ChatGPT is not a search engine.

So like a 0.5% increase per person per day in consumption? That's a LOT. What is this person smoking?

Nah dude. That’s a cooked outlook. Thanks for the perspective.

fps gamers complaining about chat gpt's electricity consumption will never stop being funny

Not everyone uses ChatGPT et al at a micro level. Corps are touting AI as the savior of everything, & building their SOPs around it. 3 Wh IS tiny, a single person won't do damage but big tech corps can.

Okay if you read the article properly you'll see that's a very bad conclusion to make

The lie machine is lying again

💯