This is a solution and one lots of people are going to. It works. It’s also pedagogically terrible. Fundamentally ableist in structure. It assesses skills that are not the relevant skills for any meaningful intellectual activity. It represses skills that are meaningful. I don’t have an answer.
I have a simple solution to this. Grade students entirely by means of three hour hand-written exams in a big hall with no computers. If they all fail because they never learned to write without AI, sucks to be them
but aren't all tools used to measure knowledge flawed and biased in some way? is this really such an awful solution? at the very least, as you said, it works.
and I'm sorry to disagree but producing factual content under pressure is definitely a relevant skill for many intellectual activities
May 7, 2025 15:11
