GR: Can present asylum claim. She's being held for consideration of her asylum claim, not to determine whether CBP correctly cancelled her visa. CR: Let me ask, you contend she doesn't have any intention to immigrate to the US. Wants to work here, not immigrate. Is that true?

GR: True. CR: Why asylum? GR: She was forced to apply, the Gov. put her in removal proceedings to deport her to Russia. I would respectfully say her expressing credible fear doesn;t' mean she has the intention to reside in the US permanently. Intention of having her life. She COULD go to Paris.

GR: Was willing to go to Paris. The Gov. did not let her. Fact she has applied for asylum doesn't make her an impending immigrant. At the time of inadmissibility, not conversation about her fear or impending immigrant. Focused solely on the customs violation.

GR: Simple argument .Read under 1225(b)(1). It says, "if the officer finds…inadmdissible under (a)(6) or (7), " it lists the next steps.

Gr: If you set aside the baseless inadmissibility determination. Clearly arbitrary. Enough evidence to set aside the inadmissibility. Then the whole 1225(b)(1) world collapses. Moving on.