Racism but leftishly
I'm left wing on all things, but immigration. Too many people = more destruction of nature = more food insecurity into age of climate change induced shortages. Humanity should be targeting population reduction across the globe. Population growth is a ponzi scheme.
What's racist about stating a country c.50% food secure in the most nature depleted country in Europe has enough people ?. So perfectly tribal "left wing" who may vote Green call for more immigration.ANyway you're from Hungary so should be prepared for what comes next 🤡
I'd argue that animal agriculture is a better target than immigration, if you're worried about habitat destruction and food security.
A chicken and egg situation. A change to a more plant based diet would certainly help combat climate change but only reducing population size would minimise humanities effect on nature.
Start with yourself
I'm an only child my wife is an onky child and my son you've guessed it is too. So our family has decreased by 75%. Very good way of getting rich maybe u should try it.
Wow, so in addition to being an immigrant that's anti-immigrant, you're also REALLY crap at maths?
I suspect his point is that four individuals in the grandparents' generation have given rise to just one individual in the latest generation.
4 grand parents + 2 parents + 1 child = 7 people. That's family growth, not reduction.
But over time his family reduces in size, right? The birth rate is less than that required for renewal.
Only if the grandparents and parents die.
By having kids, he contributed to population growth. It's a really simple fact.
It's oversimplified. We can measure population growth directly, as you're suggesting, or by birth rate. The latter gives a better picture of the trend.
Do you not think he will have seen all eight of his grandparents die in his lifetime? So his family is now at -1 by your logic...
May 12, 2025 12:03You're being utterly irritating and I'll block you soon.
There's a difference between population growth, and that idiot saying his family is reduced by 75, which is patently untrue.
For now you're muted. Go troll elsewhere.
Answer me this. In your view was the Chinese one child policy designed to slowly increase the population one birth at a time?
