You keep calling that "choice" argument into play and it doesn't hold water.
There is far greater choice for the public to remain safe against the hazards presented. Hence, the red line in available weaponry.
That isn't a grip, it's common sense.
Your gripe is the line isn’t what you want it.
No one is forcing you to purchase a firearm of any kind if you choose not to. That’s how freedom works, you get to make the choice you want and others get to make a different one if they want.
If you don’t see the concept of freedom and being allowing to makes choices for yourself as holding water it’s a failure on your end. Again you don’t want to own one don’t buy one.
Please respond and don't hedge.
If a bazooka can take out a classroom of children or concert goers in less than a minute & an AR15 can do the same equal to a M16 firing up to 600-rounds per minute why is there is red line in ownership for one & not the other?
It's not about choice.
May 2, 2025 00:53Because one is commonly chambered in 22 caliber while the other is an explosive device. Are you really saying you don’t see the difference between an explosive device and a firearm that releases one single 22 caliber round with a trigger pull?
