This is never ending.
Reply back with something like OLMo 2 and you'll quickly understand that these people only know chatgpt because Fox news said chatgpt because chatgpt is chatgpt the chatgpt...
Go fight chatgpt, friend. Go wow openai with your understanding of copyright and AI.
reminder: a significant percentage of the anti-AI crowd cannot ever be convinced because when you debunk any of their foundational talking points they will just go “okay whatever, that point i was endlessly harping on doesn’t actually matter, let’s talk about something entirely subjective instead”
I mean I'm training a Llama 2 model on my homelab so I can ask the AI targeted questions about my setup - but that's not infringing on someone's intellectual property.
Oops sorry... "ChAt gPT ScArY AaAaA the AI overlords are coming for mah jerbs"
May 6, 2025 22:19I’m not super deep into AI but when someone releases a model that’s verifiably trained on public domain and other open-license works and nothing where authors have opted out of AI scraping, I’ll use it for my homelab projects and tap about it. Til then, imma be mad about it
Oh jump to OLMo 2.
Why the response in the (now doubled) quote? Most people reacting to LLM related posts with that response are defending the trash wizard author from companies like Meta (who make llama2) and torrents copyrighted books.
I’ll check it out
