[Not loaded yet]
No doubt. Undersized, ball dominant players on mediocre teams with strong counting stats and few wins. Big contracts on teams that start and end with an “A”
Kyle Murray has "strong counting" stats? LOL. Trae is not an efficient shooter but dude puts up real numbers. And he's the best assist man in the game? Bad comp.
Yes healthy Kyler goes for 225+ passing / 40+ rushing. Trae inefficient shooter and bad defense. Has had one meaningful postseason. Come up with a better? Kyler way more valuable.
KM has never threw for 4k yds. Which like avg 20+ in the NBA. How many post season wins he's had? Has he ever led the league in anything? Bad Comp.
Apr 17, 2025 11:08If you say Dak, which is also an option IMO, Dak is wayyyy better at football than Trae at hoops. But both mostly whatever guys.
Agreed but you are digressing now.
Maybe. Just saying it’s a good comp, and I don’t see Traes stats being better. Truly a Trae QB would go 400-800 for 4500 yards and lose his job in the NFL. Qb cannot be that inefficient so think Kyler about as close as you get.
Name one party if KM game that is elite. And don't say running.
lol I can’t. But overall he’s still better at football than Trae ranked 55th in win shares... Kyler is a top 12 QB or so and way more valuable. I’m not even sure what you’re arguing? Are you related to Trae? Guys meh. Kyler’s meh. Comp isn’t insulting either of them.
Of course you can't. Because there aren't any. That torpedoes your whole argument. I said my argument several times. ...BAD COMP!
Good day!