[Not loaded yet]
And your implicit vote for Trump helped who exactly? There is no logic here at all. Those 30% gave our democracy away. Literally. They hurt countless people all over the globe.
“Implicit vote”?
Nancy, not voting for someone isn’t voting for the other person automatically.
The people who voted for Trump are the ones who voted for Trump. Kamala could’ve won a lot of the people who didn’t vote for her by appealing to them, but she thought she could win without them.
Yes, it is. It's the reality that anyone who did not vote for Harris, allowed Trump's win. That's just a fact.
All those people are responsible for the authoritarian regime we now live in and may not survive. You can tell yourself otherwise all day long but it changes nothing.
Then I guess Harris should’ve tried to win their votes better. You’re blaming the very people who are most affected by her abandonment of them for her loss.
The voters are responsible. Of the people, by the people. The power is ours.The voters must be held accountable. People chose to be uninformed. They chose not to read Project 2025 and believe it. It's on them. If we survive, we have many changes to make but those voters may have killed our chance.
No, the voters aren’t responsible. The power is ours to choose a leader that we are represented by, and there was no anti-genocide candidate this election. So those voters didn’t vote.
Kamala’s the one person who could have done something to turn those people out. She killed out chance.
Tell us who is this candidate you think everyone would vote for?
I'd love to know, who's this perfect candidate?
Name them
Or are you saying folks are never going to vote because it's always something?
Because what you're doing there, is proving us correct
They want chaos, at a cost to millions
I think everyone would vote for a Kamala Harris who 1). Wouldn’t back away from the left and hug the right, fruitlessly, fecklessly even; 2). Would confront the right about their role in America’s toxicity, possibly prosecuting the people behind Jan 6th??, and 3). Would commit to not fund a genocide
May 1, 2025 21:58So say she didn't, now what
We let us slide into fascism?
Who gives af about everything else?
Who gives af about protecting millions here?
Let it all burn?
That's an awful lot of privilege, or stupidity
And it's ok to call out that kind of privilege when the world is on fire
Then we hope she is still popular enough to win the election—which she evidently wasn’t!
Like I don’t understand how this is so confusing to you two. Trump is bad but voting is FOR someone to be president. If that person isn’t appealing they won’t get votes!
When you single-handedly dismantle Citizens United and the Electoral College, talk to me. Until then, enjoy your naivety abd your crystal ball.
No, that didn’t need to happen for Kamala to win lol. Those are political positions she could have campaigned on that she didn’t.
