- People said that back when Wikipedia sucked. Now it's very reliable, because human beings invested their time and attention.
- Some of the anti-AI stuff feels a bit like when people would say "don't use Wikipedia as a source." It's just like anything else, a piece of information that you weigh against multiple sources and your own understanding of its likely failure modes
- This user is blocked by the author of the focused post.Not the same. We do not know what AI learns from, nor how it may evolve its learning, nor how much is done to correct it (how much effort will it take to monitor and correct something expected to be far more knowledgeable than anyone?) AI trained by validated data, like medical journals, is ok
