Philosophy of Science
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- I've felt for a while that a mainstream method, reverse engineering, in cognitive science & AI is incompatible w computationalism‼️ So I wrote "Modern Alchemy: Neurocognitive Reverse Engineering" w the wonderful Natalia S. & @irisvanrooij.bsky.social to elaborate: philsci-archive.pitt.edu/25289/ 1/n
- Carlo Rovelli on the importance of good #PhilSci to making advances in physics. On his account, misinterpretations of Kuhn and Popper by practicing physicists account in part for what he considers to be too much work on unproductive research programs. #HistSTM
- [Not loaded yet]
- This might be recency bias, but I think this is the best paper I've written. It showcases how causal models can unite engineering, dynamic systems theory and biology, while pointing to the work to be done in learning and applying causal concepts. philsci-archive.pitt.edu/25288/
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]
- [Not loaded yet]